The Lies of Nayda Octomom Suleman
blog
X17Online | Topic | The Lies of Nayda Octomom Suleman
 
 
Discussion

 

The Lies of Nadya Suleman

 

No government assistance.  She receives $490/mo. In food stamps and $800/mo. for 3 pre-octuplet “disabled” children (totaling $2400/mo in SSI).  She currently owes more than $50K in student loans, the majority of which can be assumed to have been used for “cost of living expenses.”

Injury.  Claimed Worker’s Compensation payments for an on-the-job injury in 1999.  However, looking at photos of her with her children riding her like a pony during the so called “injury period,” it is obvious that she was fraudulently drawing payment which totaled $167K.  Is this what a person with a “lower back injury” does?  Fraud?

 

 

 

 

IVF paid for by savings while working.  Let’s do a little math.  She’s 33, she sustained a work related injury in 1999 (subtract 10 years, she was 23).  She could have conceivably begun working full-time at the age of 18 (that’s 5 years for her to have earned the $100K+ she claims she had in savings specifically for invitro fertilization).  If she had that kind of money in “savings,” how would not have qualified for food stamps?

 

House in her step-dad’s name.  The new home located at 2051 Madonna Lane, La Habra, California, which was owned by Amir Haddidin and sold to Suleman’s step-father, Ed Doud, according to Mike Patel, the Real Estate listing agent listed for $559,900.  Why would you suppose this was done?  Could it be to ensure that Section 8 housing assistance might be possible in the future should media interest die out?  Could it be to protect assets from being “clawed back” if lawsuits are filed for all of the fraudulent benefit claims?

Plastic surgery.  She claims not, but come on… do you really believe that?

 

 

 

The church.  In her video blog tour of the new home Nadya declared that she was agnostic prior to the Octuplets when she previously stated she was religious and a member of Calvary Chapel, Golden Springs (http://www.calvarygs.org/news/?news_id=55) and that they were helping her with collecting donations and in finding a new home.  The church issued this statement:

Press Release Regarding Inaccurate Information

PRESS RELEASE

Calvary Chapel Golden Springs February 13, 2009

In response to recent inquires and media reports, Calvary Chapel Golden Springs is issuing this statement regarding several inaccurate assumptions regarding our involvement with Nadya Suleman, the Whittier mother of octuplets.

Nadya Suleman has recently commented that she attends Calvary Chapel Golden Springs, which prompted several media follow up inquiries concerning her attendance. Since our church is not membership-driven, we are unable to confirm or deny whether she actively attends this fellowship.  We can say, however, that no one on our staff knows her.  And to the best of our knowledge, Ms. Suleman's only contact with us was a minor inquiry regarding our Children's Ministry.

Ms. Suleman has also been credited with commenting that our church is involved with the establishment of a foundation for donation distribution, providing her with financial assistance, and helping her locate a new residence. Our church is not involved in any of these activities.

Although we are not condoning the circumstances surrounding the conception, we are relieved that the birth of the infants was successful.

Because of the physical and emotional strain these eight newborn babies will place on her and her six young children, they will need spiritual guidance and child care assistance, twenty-four hours a day, from her surrounding community, for years to come.  Also, these pre-mature infants may continue to need ongoing professional care throughout their lifetime.

Since Calvary Chapel Golden Springs will not be involved with the organization or handling of these professional assistance programs, we will direct individuals, who are willing to assist Ms. Suleman, to the already established web sites that are committed to organizing and supporting Ms. Suleman and her children.

Whose the daddy???

Some say there are similarities between her children and her step-father, Ed Doud.  Yes, no?  At this point, who knows with this pathological liar and amazing manipulator. 

Tales of ovarian cancer to get the ex to donate sperm.  Denis Beaudoin, Suleman’s ex and a sperm donor, says he donated sperm because she claimed to have ovarian cancer and could not conceive otherwise.  There has been no medical documentation to prove or refute the cancer claim (although Suleman appears to be fond of that answer when questioned about pregnancy issues [i.e., to her mother regarding the latest pregnancy, “it’s a tumor” see below]). 

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVG5IXtRJns)

 

 

 

 

Lying to her mother about insemination and saying it’s just a tumor.  (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P-uH30Z1pE)

 

Priorities in the wrong order.  Where does she spend her money first?  The Nail Studio!  Nordstrom’s!

 

 

She’s a slob as a housekeeper.  Children don’t deserve this!!

 

 

Shameless begging for more of your money.  After saying that she would not rely on public funds, she allowed her first publicist to publish a website for private donation (although she claims she had no knowledge, whereas it was reported she chose the colors and part of the layout).  With all of Suleman’s other lies, it’s safe to assume that the first publicist told the truth.

 

 

 

Entitlement issues.  “All the diaper companies, formula companies, rescinded any offer and I feel as though I have the only higher order multiples in this country who have been denied because of the negative publicity …. I don’t believe their decision should have anything to do with me I don’t wear diapers, I don’t drink formula.”  Come on… these companies do not OWE her anything - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsarG0L0Cf0 (starts at 5:50).

 

Cannot control her own children.  Here we have young Elijah playing with the Paparazzi.  How long was this going on before anyone noticed?  And how come no one knew?  Are they really being supervised or are they all freely running wild? 

http://www.tmz.com/videos?autoplay=true&mediaKey=e3e16875-e9f1-4e53-ad70-9bfe627a0889

 

Extreme reaction.  Honestly, was this truly necessary?  Did she even consider the options before concluding the worst?  Does this 911 audio make you want to slap the hysterics out of her as much as I do?  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIUvx97r7EE

 

Opportunists.  Angles in Waiting, who has offered 24/7 nursing care and therapies, is actually broke and looking to cash in on the Suleman train wreck.  They, along with Allred, publicly decry for donations to support the Suleman Octuplets, however, they do not have the funds in place to have made such an offer.  They also state that any funds left over after the care of the Octuplets will belong to Angels in Waiting to help other California newborns.  Does this sound altruistic or opportunistic to you?  Additionally, when you say you have staff that “donates” its time for the best interest of fragile children, doesn’t that mean you do so at no cost?  Doesn’t that mean that you do NOT charge Medi-Cal for specialized treatment of foster children in the California area?  Why does this “offer” stink to high hell?

 

 

The whole purpose of this post???  To request that Californian’s PLEASE distribute Petitions to the Probate Court of California to file CONSERVATORSHIP PAPERS to take control of all monetary assets this “woman” is receiving through taxpayer, media outlets, photo opportunities, etc. that is derived from the circus freak show she has made of her entire brood of children.  This will place all assets she receives from these courses into a trust administered by a court appointed Guardian Ad Litem to be used for the current and future best interest of the children.  As a provision of such Petition, it is my sincere hope that no cash funds EVER be distributed to Nadya or any member of her family, but be distributed in the form of needed supplies and services.  I sincerely hope that these funds will be used to provide medical insurance for all of the Suleman children so that they will NEVER be a burden on Medi-Cal again.  This will also ensure the American people who would like to assist the children in this case while knowing that Nadya will NEVER benefit from any donation made or any publicity she may receive over this irresponsible act of sheer selfishness.  Who’s with me here?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Flag Copyright Report Abuse
Comments
Hi Guest, Post a Comment Log In or Sign Up

People Who Like It
There are no raters here!!! But you can put an image in this place if you want :-)